brahma-brahmastra
About the origin of Brahma....
In Western countries, governments and politicians like the British, French, etc. have gathered and banned the practice of slavery. This means that they have rejected the rules of Brahma. Because it is written in manasamhita that Brahma has created the Brahmin varna from his mouth and Brahma has created the Shudras from his feet to serve the Brahmins.
Jotirao: what you say is that the British governments have banned slavery, it means that they have rejected the laws of Brahma, right? And in this world, there are many types of people in the British etc., which Brahma has created from his senses and what is written about this in sanusanhita?
Dhondirao: all the brainy and foolish Brahmins answer that due to the impoverishment of the British etc., there is nothing written about these people in manasanhita.
Do you mean that there are no evil, evil, evil people among the Brahmins?
No, it is clear that Brahmins are the most despicable, wicked, inferior and vicious people than other castes.
What is written in manasankhita about such impoverished, vicious, vile, evil Brahmins?
This is the proof that Manu has written the method of origin in his Samhita, which is completely false, unfounded, wrong, because that principle does not apply to all people.
Jotirao: this is the reason why the knowledge of the British etc. people, by recognizing the cleverness of the Brahmin scribes, has banned the practice of slavery by law. If this Brahma was the cause of all human origin, the British etc. would not have stopped the practice of slavery. Manu has described the origin of the four varnas-if he is reconciled with the law of Creation, then we understand that the law of creation is completely wrong, unfounded, false.
Dhondirao: how is that?
Jotirao: that is how the Brahmins say that Brahmins were born from the mouth of Brahma, but the mother mother of all Brahmins must have been Brahmani, from which part of Brahma must have been born. Manu has not given any information about this in his code. Why exactly so?
Dhondirao: because he would be a foolish misogynist according to the words of those learned Brahmins. That is why he has been placed in the line of MLAs or heretics.
Jotirao: we are Bhudev, we are the best of all the Varnas, the Brahmins who always say this with great pride - the adimata who gave birth to them will be the brahmanis, will not they? So why do you put him in the line of MLAs? How would he like that wine and Beef Booze there? You have said this very wrong thing.
So many times, you have said that the ancestors of the Brahmins were Rishi-Maharishi. They used to eat a variety of dishes, by killing cows under the pretext of Shraddha. And now you only say that their native mother will smell bad. What does that mean now? Take a little patience and wish to stay in the English kingdom. Then you will see that most of the Brahmins of today, in order to please the Holy Pandits, residents, governors, etc. who do not even touch their clothes and bodies, will also eat the leftover pieces of meat lying on their table. Barre's hands will not let even a piece. Do you not know that even today, many Brahmins have started to grumble in the name of the English inside. Manu has not written anything about the origin of Adi Brahmani. Therefore, put all the responsibility for this defect on his head. Why are you blaming me for that, that I am speaking wrong. Leave these things, tell me further.
Come on, as you like, right. The one who gave birth to Brahma by mouth was impure for three or four days when every month on menstruation ( Month Wise) came from the mouth of Brahma, or did the Lingayat devour like women and perform all the work of the house by being pure? Has Manu NU written anything about this or not?
Dhondirao: no, but Brahma is the reason for the origin of Brahmins. And how would it be appropriate to preach the Lingayat woman? Because nowadays Brahmins hate Lingayat people. Because the people of the Lingayat sect do not observe untouchability during the days of rajodharma.
Jotirao: now you can think that the Raj will flow from the mouth, arms, thighs and feet of Brahma - these four places of the four Yonis. So he will have to sit away as untouchable for a total of sixteen days. When it happens to him, who will do his housework? Has Manu written anything about this in his Manusmriti or not?
Oh, my god, there's nothing written about it.
And he said, ' Well, from the day that the womb was placed in the mouth of Brahma, where did Manu live and grow until the nine months passed?'
J., I haven't said anything about that.
Jotirao: well, the Brahmin child in that generation was given breast milk by Brahma or fed outside milk and made him grow up from small.
Gee, no.
Part-2.......scroll down
About Saraswati.....
Jotirao: Brahma's wife was Savitri, but why did Brahma take the burden of the child, the hassle of holding it in his mouth for nine months, of giving birth and raising it? How surprising it is!
Dhondirao: why Ji (Sir)? Were the other three of them far away from him or not? Or did that chhinala Chhaila (vyabhichari or randibaz) always like to play the game of ramkar gharkundi among the girls? Why would that bitch have born the desire to be a mother like this?
And if he was to say that he was the only one who had the power to do so, he would have the power to do so. That is why his surname has become kanyagami (daughter chod). The result of this vile work of his is that no one worships him.
If there were indeed four mouths of Brahma, then according to that, Brahma should have eight breasts, four navels, four vaginas and four bulwarks. But no written evidence has been found to give the correct information about this. If this is to be considered in the same way, then the question will also be present: when Lakshmi seshasayi was Vishnu's wife, and notwithstanding his wife Lakshmi, how did Vishnu raise this four-faced child from his navel? If you think about this, Vishnu's position will be the same as Brahma's.
Part-3.......
About the Iranian people...
